Health Data and Interoperability Standards
Why is there a
problem?
There is a problem because of the difference between syntax and semantics.
Example: National
Drug Code system (FDA)
Medication is mainstay of all dieases so standardization
across all of them is very important.
National Library of
Medicine
–
RxNorm (RXCUI unique number) to access the drug
names
–
UMLS – unified medical language system
Standards for Medical
problems
Brief history:
-
Mid 1400 Northern Italy – Death certificates –
name & age of deceased, cause of death certified by physician
-
Black death 1629-1631: Death certificates used
as source of data for analysis
-
1661 London – Captain John Graunt interested in
why children die – turned to death certificates to learn
-
Massachusetts 1639 – death certificate made
available for analysis
-
London 1839 William Farr discovers
interoperability
o
Each disease described in many ways, many terms
(this is a problem!)
-
London 1851 Great exposition, demonstrate top
technology. Difficult to compare because no standards
-
Chicago 1893, International List of Causes of
Death (Bertillon Classification) He grouped disease by what we recognize today
-
Denmark 1899, ICD (international classification
of diseases) Decennial revisions, 10th in 1994, first disease
“ontonogy” US want to use it in Oct 2015, only advanced industrial country to
not use it.
-
ICD-10: Radical departure. Introduce content
model to facilitate automatic coding of diseases. More specific and detailed.
Another example:
Result: vast increase in complexity. 16X more codes. Lots of
complaints from providers.
Example:
LOINC Codes – Logical Observation Identifier Names and Codes
- developed
by Regenstrief Institude in Indiana, leading health information center in US.
Very interesting blog. Alot of blogs I see these days don't really provide anything that I'm interested in, but I'm most definately interested in this one. Just thought that I would post and let you know. anabolic steroids for sale online steroidsonline.org
ReplyDelete